Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets

نویسندگان

  • Stuart H. M. Butchart
  • Jörn P. W. Scharlemann
  • Mike I. Evans
  • Suhel Quader
  • Salvatore Aricò
  • Julius Arinaitwe
  • Mark Balman
  • Leon A. Bennun
  • Bastian Bertzky
  • Charles Besançon
  • Timothy M. Boucher
  • Thomas M. Brooks
  • Ian J. Burfield
  • Neil D. Burgess
  • Simba Chan
  • Rob P. Clay
  • Mike J. Crosby
  • Nicholas C. Davidson
  • Naamal De Silva
  • Christian Devenish
  • Guy C. L. Dutson
  • David F. Día z Fernández
  • Lincoln D. C. Fishpool
  • Claire Fitzgerald
  • Matt Foster
  • Melanie F. Heath
  • Marc Hockings
  • Michael Hoffmann
  • David Knox
  • Frank W. Larsen
  • John F. Lamoreux
  • Colby Loucks
  • Ian May
  • James Millett
  • Dominic Molloy
  • Paul Morling
  • Mike Parr
  • Taylor H. Ricketts
  • Nathalie Seddon
  • Benjamin Skolnik
  • Simon N. Stuart
  • Amy Upgren
  • Stephen Woodley
چکیده

Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of conservation efforts and now cover nearly 13% of the world's land surface, with the world's governments committed to expand this to 17%. However, as biodiversity continues to decline, the effectiveness of PAs in reducing the extinction risk of species remains largely untested. We analyzed PA coverage and trends in species' extinction risk at globally significant sites for conserving birds (10,993 Important Bird Areas, IBAs) and highly threatened vertebrates and conifers (588 Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, AZEs) (referred to collectively hereafter as 'important sites'). Species occurring in important sites with greater PA coverage experienced smaller increases in extinction risk over recent decades: the increase was half as large for bird species with>50% of the IBAs at which they occur completely covered by PAs, and a third lower for birds, mammals and amphibians restricted to protected AZEs (compared with unprotected or partially protected sites). Globally, half of the important sites for biodiversity conservation remain unprotected (49% of IBAs, 51% of AZEs). While PA coverage of important sites has increased over time, the proportion of PA area covering important sites, as opposed to less important land, has declined (by 0.45-1.14% annually since 1950 for IBAs and 0.79-1.49% annually for AZEs). Thus, while appropriately located PAs may slow the rate at which species are driven towards extinction, recent PA network expansion has under-represented important sites. We conclude that better targeted expansion of PA networks would help to improve biodiversity trends.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Template for Submission of Scientific Information to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas Title/Name of the area: Important Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Areas of India

in less than 150 words) The coastal and marine ecosystems of peninsular India have been surveyed in detail to identify and prioritize the ‘Important Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Areas (ICMBA)’ for their better management, in addition to the existing Marine Protected Areas. This study followed the standardized global, national and regional level approaches to develop a criteria with several i...

متن کامل

Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets.

There are now over 100000 protected areas worldwide, covering over 12% of the Earth's land surface. These areas represent one of the most significant human resource use allocations on the planet. The importance of protected areas is reflected in their widely accepted role as an indicator for global targets and environmental assessments. However, measuring the number and extent of protected area...

متن کامل

The Effect of Carbon Credits on Savanna Land Management and Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation

Carbon finance offers the potential to change land management and conservation planning priorities. We develop a novel approach to planning for improved land management to conserve biodiversity while utilizing potential revenue from carbon biosequestration. We apply our approach in northern Australia's tropical savanna, a region of global significance for biodiversity and carbon storage, both o...

متن کامل

Grasslands of the World: Diversity, Management and Conservation

Features provide a comprehensive global overview of extent and diversity of grasslands. Analyzes how humans shaped grasslands through millennia of use and which role they play in present-day agriculture. Quantifies the role of grasslands as biodiversity hotspots as well as the drivers threatening these. Evaluates the ecosystem services grasslands provide e.g. in terms of soil protection and car...

متن کامل

Conserving Critical Sites for Biodiversity Provides Disproportionate Benefits to People

Protecting natural habitats in priority areas is essential to halt the loss of biodiversity. Yet whether these benefits for biodiversity also yield benefits for human well-being remains controversial. Here we assess the potential human well-being benefits of safeguarding a global network of sites identified as top priorities for the conservation of threatened species. Conserving these sites wou...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012